Setho, Lo que yo te dije fué:Iniciado por Setho333
"1. El famoso estudio de los gemelos(EL DE BAILEY Y PILLARD QUISE DECIR!). Según dicha teoría se encontraron que si en una misma familia o institución habían gemelos idénticos en los que uno de los dos era gay que el otro gemelo también lo eran el 50% de los casos y que por lo tanto ya venían gay al mundo. Dicho estudio fue desacreditado por otro estudio en que se estudiaron gemelos separados de nacimiento en los cuales si uno era gay, el otro no lo era con más frecuencia que en el resto de la población, lo cual indica que son las influencias dentro del mismo seno de la familia o institución en donde se crían los gemelos lo que los volvió gay y no una supuesta razón biológica.
Sobre eso, ve y lee el artículo por Michael Bailey and Richard Pillard, investigadores de Northwestern University la Boston University School of Medicine ( 1991, 48:1089-1096) quienes examinaron a 56 pares de gemelos idénticos, 54 pares de gemelos fraternales, 142 hermanos de los gemelos, y 57 pares de hermanos adoptivos."
Pensé indicado dirigirte a leer el estudio de Bailey y Pillard en su artículo original, para que constates que los gemelos fueron estudiados en familias adoptivas o en instituciones en donde se criaron todos juntos y que por lo tanto expuestas a las mismas influencias de su entorno. No obstante que Bailey y Pillard encuentran un alto índice de gemelos idénticos homosexuales(52%) no alcanzan llegar al 100% lo cual se esperaría si hubiese una causa genética. Sorprendentemente también los gemelos fraternos con cromosomas no idénticos son altamente afectados casi al mismo grado que los gemelos idénticos, indicando que no es algo genético sino más bien una causa del medio ambiente que les vuelve gay. Lo que significa según los críticos de Bailey y Pillard, "que su estudio más bien demuestra lo contrario de lo que ellos dos pretendían probar", escribió Neil Risch en Science (1993, 262:2063), en una carta técnica en donde aparece el artículo original de Bayley y Pillard. Es decir que son las fuerzas del entorno y no la genética lo que vuelve gay a la gente.
Abajo te dejo un link y pego el articulo sobre un estudio Australiano importante que concluye que los gemelos no nacen gay, y que tampoco es genético. En dicho estudio ni siquiera usaron a gemelos separados al nacer. Saludos,
http://www.hollanddavis.com/?p=3647
Identical twin studies prove homosexuality is not genetic
Dr. Neil Whitehead
Eight major studies of identical twins in Australia, the U.S., and Scandinavia during the last two decades all arrive at the same conclusion: gays were not born that way.
“At best genetics is a minor factor,” says Dr. Neil Whitehead, PhD. Whitehead worked for the New Zealand government as a scientific researcher for 24 years, then spent four years working for the United Nations and International Atomic Energy Agency. Most recently, he serves as a consultant to Japanese universities about the effects of radiation exposure. His PhD is in biochemistry and statistics.
Identical twins have the same genes or DNA. They are nurtured in equal prenatal conditions. If homosexuality is caused by genetics or prenatal conditions and one twin is gay, the co-twin should also be gay.
“Because they have identical DNA, it ought to be 100%,” Dr. Whitehead notes. But the studies reveal something else. “If an identical twin has same-sex attraction the chances the co-twin has it are only about 11% for men and 14% for women.”
Because identical twins are always genetically identical, homosexuality cannot be genetically dictated. “No-one is born gay,” he notes. “The predominant things that create homosexuality in one identical twin and not in the other have to be post-birth factors.”
Dr. Whitehead believes same-sex attraction (SSA) is caused by “non-shared factors,” things happening to one twin but not the other, or a personal response to an event by one of the twins and not the other.
For example, one twin might have exposure to pornography or sexual abuse, but not the other. One twin may interpret and respond to their family or classroom environment differently than the other. “These individual and idiosyncratic responses to random events and to common environmental factors predominate,” he says.
The first very large, reliable study of identical twins was conducted in Australia in 1991, followed by a large U.S. study about 1997. Then Australia and the U.S. conducted more twin studies in 2000, followed by several studies in Scandinavia, according to Dr. Whitehead.
“Twin registers are the foundation of modern twin studies. They are now very large, and exist in many countries. A gigantic European twin register with a projected 600,000 members is being organized, but one of the largest in use is in Australia, with more than 25,000 twins on the books.”
A significant twin study among adolescents shows an even weaker genetic correlation. In 2002 Bearman and Brueckner studied tens of thousands of adolescent students in the U.S. The same-sex attraction concordance between identical twins was only 7.7% for males and 5.3% for females—lower than the 11% and 14% in the Australian study by Bailey et al conducted in 2000.
In the identical twin studies, Dr. Whitehead has been struck by how fluid and changeable sexual identity can be.
“Neutral academic surveys show there is substantial change. About half of the homosexual/bisexual population (in a non-therapeutic environment) moves towards heterosexuality over a lifetime. About 3% of the present heterosexual population once firmly believed themselves to be homosexual or bisexual.”
“Sexual orientation is not set in concrete,” he notes.
Even more remarkable, most of the changes occur without counseling or therapy. “These changes are not therapeutically induced, but happen ‘naturally’ in life, some very quickly,” Dr. Whitehead observes. “Most changes in sexual orientation are towards exclusive heterosexuality.”
Numbers of people who have changed towards exclusive heterosexuality are greater than current numbers of bisexuals and homosexuals combined. In other words, ex-gays outnumber actual gays.
The fluidity is even more pronounced among adolescents, as Bearman and Brueckner’s study demonstrated. “They found that from 16 to 17-years-old, if a person had a romantic attraction to the same sex, almost all had switched one year later.”
“The authors were pro-gay and they commented that the only stability was among the heterosexuals, who stayed the same year after year. Adolescents are a special case—generally changing their attractions from year to year.”
Still, many misconceptions persist in the popular culture. Namely, that homosexuality is genetic – so hard-wired into one’s identity that it can’t be changed. “The academics who work in the field are not happy with the portrayals by the media on the subject,” Dr. Whitehead notes. “But they prefer to stick with their academic research and not get involved in the activist side.”
Responder Citando